A Study of Closed-House Systems in Broiler Production

Authors

  • Handayani Indah Susanti
    Jurusan Ilmu Peternakan Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Keywords:

broiler chickens, closed houses, productivity

Abstract

This study aims to determine broiler chickens' production performance in a closed-house system. The research was conducted in a closed-house system with a capacity of 22,000 CP 707 strains at plasma breeders of PT. Prosperous Star Together. The variables used in this study include harvested body weight, body weight gain, Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), Performance Index (IP) and percentage of depletion. The research technique used is direct observation in the field. Sampling uses simple random sampling, where the sample is randomly selected from a specified number. Analysis tools used descriptive method. The measurement data will be compared with the performance standards of broiler chickens according to PT. Charoen Pokphand. The results showed that the average body weight at 25 days was 1.614 kg/head, increased body weight was 1.564 kg/head, FCR was 1.36, IP was 465.45 and depletion percentage was 1.95%. The conclusion that can be drawn from the results of this study is that the production performance of broiler chickens kept in a closed-house system reaches the standards of PT. Charoen Pokphand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arum, KT, Cahyadi, ER, & Basith, A. (2017). Performance Evaluation of Broiler Partner Breeders. Journal of Production Science and Technology of Animal Husbandry Products, 5 (2), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.29244/jipthp.5.2.78-83

Dharmawan, R., Prayogi, HS, & Nurgiartiningsih, VMA (2005). Performance of broiler production reared on the upper and lower floors. Journal of Animal Sciences, 26 (3), 27–37.

Hardani, H., Medica, P., Husada, F., Andriani, H., Sukmana, DJ, Mada, UG, & Fardani, R. (2020). Qualitative & Quantitative Research Methods Book (April Issue).

Laili, Ana Rohmatul, Ratna Damayanti, Boedi Setiawan, SH (2022). Comparison of Broiler Performance in Closed House and Open House Systems in Trenggalek. Journal of Applied Veterinary Science and Technology, 03, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.20473/javest.V3.01.2022.6-11

Pakage, S., Hartono, B., Fanani, Z., Nugroho, BA, Iyai, DA, Palulungan, JA, & Nurhayati, OD (2020). Performance Measurement of Broiler Production in Closed House Systems and Open House Systems in Malang Regency, East Java, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Animal Husbandry Science, 15 (4), 383–389.

Respati, AN, Hakim, A., & Kusuma, and AHA (2018). Comparison of Production and Financial Analysis of Broiler Farm with Close House and Open House Farm System in Partnership Patterns. Bantara Journal of Animal Science, 1 (6), 11–21.

Ulfa, ML, & Djunaidi, IH (2019). Banana weevil flour substitution and Indigofera sp. As a Substitute for Bran in Rations to Improve Broiler Chicken Performance. Journal of Tropical Animal Nutrition, 2 (2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jnt.2019.002.02.6

Umam, MK, Prayogi, HS, & Nurgiartiningsih, VMA (2014). The Performance of Broiler Rearing in System Stage Floor and Double Floor. Journal of Animal Sciences, 24 (3), 79–87.

Widana, IPVH, Sukanata., IW, & Kayana, IGN (2020). Tropical Farm Tropical Farm. Journal Of Tropical Animal Science, 537–548. https://simdos.unud.ac.id

Yemima. (2014). Business analysis of broiler chicken farming on smallholder farms in Karya Bakti Village, Rungan District, Gunung Mas Regency, Central Kalimantan Province. Journal of Tropical Animal Science, 3 (1), 27–32.

Published

2023-08-07

How to Cite

Susanti, H. I. (2023). A Study of Closed-House Systems in Broiler Production. JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Agribisnis) : Jurnal Agribisnis Dan Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 8(3), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.37149/jia.v8i3.188

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2023)

Section

Articles
Digital Object Identifier
https://doi.org/10.37149/jia.v8i3.188
Copyright & Licensing

Copyright (c) 2023 Handayani Indah Susanti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship initial publication in this journal.